Good fences make good neighbors, the old adage says. However, in the case of six local municipalities, the very opposite may soon ring true. This winter, South Burlington officials began talking with neighboring towns about a possible multi-community conservation partnership they’re calling the Southwest Chittenden County Conservation Partnership.

The proposed partnership would define, acquire and protect land that is now partially preserved along shared borders between the city, Williston, Shelburne, Hinesburg, Charlotte and St. George.

“The cost of conservation, especially when you talk about land acquisition, is pretty high,” South Burlington city project manager Ashley Parker said, adding, partnerships can help municipalities strengthen grant applications and fund greater conservation efforts.

While none of the municipalities have officially gained selectboard or council approval, discussions have begun in South Burlington, Shelburne, Hinesburg and Williston.

There’s no set timeline, but it’s possible more definitive action will occur by June, Parker said.

The partnership, as drafted, promotes conservation through a combination of land acquisition, shared language around parcel classification and a common map denoting protected lands. It also discusses creating best practices for land stewardship, maintaining land connectivity between borders and engaging the public to join conservation efforts.  

Currently, each municipality has its own language for “partially conserved” land parcels, Parker said. These areas are protected for the time being, but can be vulnerable to changes in zoning regulations and classifications. Under the partnership, towns would establish a standardized map, as well as a classification system to identify preserved land and gaps where conservation efforts could be made.

Banding together would also enable municipalities to potentially work on larger conservation issues such as water quality across the region, according to Parker.

“Everything drains to Lake Champlain,” she said. “Us coming together and formalizing our standards for conservation will be really important in improving all of that.”

But first, the municipalities must come to a formal agreement and set priorities. This entails everything from visioning to administrative details like naming representatives and setting regular meeting schedules.

South Burlington, Hinesburg, Shelburne and Williston have presented the draft accord to their city council and select boards, respectively, but none of the municipalities have made a final decision.

Attendees at the Hinesburg meeting expressed concern about how to sustain the partnership. In the past, similar initiatives have failed to gain traction.

Hinesburg Director of Planning and Zoning Alex Weinhagen said he’d like to discuss that concern at the proposed conservation partnership’s next meeting. While he’s unsure how to ensure the group’s longevity, he thinks soliciting additional guidance from the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission professionals could help. According to Parker, strong core leadership and funding will help determine the future of the partnership.

It’s easy to stay in one’s own municipal silo, but a partnership would encourage towns to “cross-pollinate” conservation ideas and tactics, Weinhagen said. “It’s something that … we find interesting,” he added.

Hinesburg’s discussions will continue at its future selectboard meetings. It’s possible the town could make a final decision as soon as May, according to Weinhagen.

In Williston, trustees are “open” to the idea of the partnership but want greater detail around its organizational goals, senior planner, conservation Melinda Scott said. It’s possible a formal decision will be made within the next month or two, she added.

Charlotte has yet to attend the proposed partnership’s meetings, but town administrator Dean Bloch said it seems like “great work” and is of definite interest. The town may bring the idea to its selectboard, but no timeline has been established, he added.

Calls to officials in the town of St. George for comment were not returned by press time.

Although the partnership is in its fledgling stage, Parker sees the potential for it to grow and amass community partners.

“One of the neat things about this group is that it’s a bunch of towns and cities that are coming together understanding that natural resources cross boundaries,” she said. With that in mind, she envisions local businesses, residents and even university students joining the effort to preserve the region’s untouched spaces.

“It’s really important to get the people involved,” Parker said. “You can’t have good stewardship or good conservation without the support, and even the help, of your citizens.”

But as Weinhagan said, the partnership would first have to officially form and establish itself before the community could contribute. Parker is hopeful that will come to fruition soon.

“We’re all learning from each other and I think that’s only going to make all of us better at what we’re doing in our own communities,” she said.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.